Member-only story

Defence Of The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

Anthony Burgess

·9.1k Followers· Follow

Published in Truth In Virtue Of Meaning: A Defence Of The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction

4 min read · 4 weeks before

237 View Claps

41 Respond

Save

Listen

The analytic-synthetic distinction is one of the most fundamental and well-established distinctions in philosophy. It divides all propositions into two categories: analytic propositions, which are true solely in virtue of the meanings of their terms, and synthetic propositions, which are true or false independently of the meanings of their terms.

This distinction has been challenged by many philosophers over the years, but it remains a cornerstone of our understanding of knowledge and language. In this article, we will defend the analytic-synthetic distinction, focusing specifically on the arguments of Immanuel Kant.

Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2081 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	256 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

Kant's Defence of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

Kant's defence of the analytic-synthetic distinction is based on his theory of knowledge. According to Kant, we can only have knowledge of things that we can experience. This is because all of our knowledge is derived from experience, and we can only experience things that are present to our senses.

Analytic propositions are true solely in virtue of the meanings of their terms because they do not say anything about the world that we cannot already know from the meanings of their terms. For example, the proposition "All bachelors are unmarried" is analytic because the meaning of the term "bachelor" already implies that a bachelor is unmarried.

Synthetic propositions, on the other hand, are true or false independently of the meanings of their terms because they say something about the world that we cannot know from the meanings of their terms. For example, the proposition "All swans are white" is synthetic because the meaning of the term "swan" does not imply that all swans are white.

Kant argues that the analytic-synthetic distinction is essential for our understanding of knowledge because it allows us to distinguish between what we know a priori and what we know a posteriori. A priori knowledge is knowledge that we have independently of experience, while a posteriori knowledge is knowledge that we have from experience.

Analytic propositions are a priori knowledge because they are true solely in virtue of the meanings of their terms. Synthetic propositions, on the other hand, are a posteriori knowledge because they are true or false independently of the meanings of their terms.

Objections to the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

There have been many objections to the analytic-synthetic distinction over the years. One common objection is that the distinction is not clear-cut. There are many propositions that seem to fall somewhere in between the analytic and synthetic categories.

Another objection is that the analytic-synthetic distinction is not useful. It does not help us to understand the world around us or to make better decisions. In fact, some philosophers have argued that the distinction can actually be harmful because it can lead us to believe that some types of knowledge are more certain than they actually are.

Despite these objections, the analytic-synthetic distinction remains a valuable tool for understanding knowledge and language. It allows us to distinguish between what we know a priori and what we know a posteriori, and it can help us to avoid making mistakes based on false beliefs.

In this article, we have defended the analytic-synthetic distinction based on the arguments of Immanuel Kant. We have argued that the distinction is essential for our understanding of knowledge and that it is a valid and useful tool for distinguishing between different types of propositions.

References

Kant, I. (1781/1805). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Strawson, P. F. (1956). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction

5 out of 5